The Midweek Updates — 5 August 2026
News around UX and more, recommended books
Bringing you the latest and greatest in UX industry related to wellbeing, mental health and psychological safety — this week plus my lens about them.
Workers resisting and sabotaging AI mandates
Welcome To The Resistance: Meet The Workers Dodging (And Sabotaging) Their Employer’s AI Mandates
This one stopped me mid-scroll. Aftermath spoke to workers across industries who are quietly refusing, minimising, or outright sabotaging the AI tools their companies force on them. One employee was told to document, in writing, how they would incorporate AI into their workflow — they wrote something sarcastic and moved on. Games industry workers are sharing AI-avoidance tips through covert channels because their keystrokes are literally being monitored. One person described professional AI conversations that made them “want to walk into the sea.”
My take: this is what happens when adoption is treated as a compliance problem instead of a trust problem. When people hide how they actually work from their own managers, you don’t have an AI strategy — you have a psychological safety crisis wearing a productivity costume. Designers, of all people, should recognise this pattern. We’d never ship a feature users are actively routing around and call it a success.
Employers face backfire when they force staff to use AI
Employers pushed staff to use AI more. That has backfired.
A global survey of 3,750 executives and employees found 54% of workers bypassed their mandated AI tools in the last 30 days and just did the work manually. Another 33% skipped AI entirely. Workers now lose the equivalent of 51 working days a year to technology friction, and stacking four or more AI tools onto someone actually lowers their self-reported productivity.
And my favourite absurd detail, via Fortune: the CEOs mandating all this use AI for less than an hour a week themselves.
My take: none of this means AI is useless. It means “use it or else” is a management style, not a strategy — and it’s the same energy as RTO mandates. Fewer tools, chosen deliberately, understood deeply. That’s true for design systems, and it’s true for AI.
Doing less AI is becoming a design position
Consumer excitement about AI has collapsed from 50% two years ago to just 19% in 2026. Roughly half of consumers now say they’d rather buy from brands that avoid generative AI in their messaging. When Gucci ran an AI campaign earlier this year, the backlash wasn’t about the tech — it was about craftsmanship. Meanwhile Aerie’s anti-AI campaign with Pamela Anderson landed on a single line: “You can’t prompt this.”
👉🏼 When Consumers Rage Against AI Imagery
👉🏼 NN/g’s State of UX 2026 called this: as AI fatigue grows, human details differentiate
My take: “human-made” is quietly becoming what “organic” was to food — a premium label people will pay for. For designers exhausted by the pressure to automate everything, this is oddly hopeful news. Your taste, your judgment, your fingerprints on the work — that’s not the thing AI is replacing. It’s the thing the market is starting to price up.
The layoffs haven’t stopped. Neither has the damage.
2026 is on pace to be worse than last year: over 170,000 tech workers cut so far, against 245,000 in all of 2025. Microsoft alone let go of 4,800 people in July, with Xbox hit hardest. And the human cost is far darker than the press releases suggest — research links layoffs to a 2.5× higher suicide risk and a 15–20% increase in early mortality. In a survey of tech workers, 77% said the constant fear of layoffs alone was harming their mental wellbeing. Not the layoff. The fear of it.
👉🏼 Tech layoffs 2026 tracker — Engadget/Yahoo
👉🏼 The Tech Industry Is Quietly Destroying Mental Health — Offboard
My take: last week I wrote about “layoff fatigue” and the forever-layoff pattern. This is its endpoint. One writer called the past few years a mass-trauma event wrapped in HR jargon, and honestly, I can’t put it better. If you’re leading a design team right now, understand that your team is not “unmotivated” — they are grieving, hypervigilant, and doing risk calculations in every meeting. Design your rituals accordingly.
Recommended books
Blood in the Machine by Brian Merchant
Brian Merchant’s Blood in the Machine tells the real story of the Luddites — not the technology-hating caricature, but skilled workers who fought back when factory owners used machines to degrade their craft, slash their wages, and destroy their communities. Merchant draws a razor-sharp line from the 1810s to today’s AI moment, showing that the fight was never against machines. It was against how machines were used, by whom, and who paid the price.
My verdict: If you’ve ever felt vaguely guilty for resisting an AI tool at work, this book will replace that guilt with clarity. For UX designers, it’s a masterclass in a question we should be asking daily: who does this technology actually serve? The workers in this week’s Aftermath piece are asking it. The Luddites asked it first.
The Good Enough Job by Simone Stolzoff
The Good Enough Job dismantles the idea that work should be our identity, our community, and our source of meaning all at once. Through stories of people who fused themselves to their careers — and what happened when those careers disappeared — Stolzoff makes a calm, compassionate case for letting a job be just a job, and building a self that survives a reorg.
My verdict: In an industry where 170,000 people have lost their jobs this year alone, “my work is my passion” is no longer romantic — it’s a structural vulnerability. This book is preventive mental healthcare for designers. Read it before you need it.
Alrighty, see you next week!
Like this?
Consider subscribing, you will get at least a weekly update on things related to alternative views on UX. This blog is an attempt of me to refute, challenge or refresh what I’ve learned and observed about UX design as a career and industry, throughout my 15+ years career as a product designer. Read more about me, or visit my UX portfolio site.